RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01566
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His make-up drill points be transferred to show a good year from
Jan 13 to Jan 14.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
There has not been an error or injustice. He was involved in an
automobile accident while on-duty with his local police
department. He was transported to the hospital and was unable to
attend drill for the months of Dec 13 and Jan 14 (2.5 months
total), causing him to have a bad year.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of the
accident report, typed statements, pictures, and code sheets.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in
the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary
responsibility which is included at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PP recommends denial. The applicant does not appear to have
exhausted all available administrative remedies prior to
petitioning the AFBCMR. The applicant should engage with his unit
prior to seeking relief from the AFBCMR. Furthermore, since there
was no error or injustice, it would not be appropriate for the
AFBCMR to direct the unit to provide the member with the necessary
points to show a good year.
The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 25 Apr 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has not exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. In this respect,
we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal
within the Air Force. As such, an applicant must first exhaust
all available avenues of administrative relief provided by
existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this
Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction. The
Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed this
application and indicated there is an available avenue of
administrative relief the applicant has not first pursued. In
view of this, we find this application is not ripe for
adjudication at this level, as there exists a subordinate level of
appeal that has not first been depleted. Therefore, in view of
the above, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that she has not exhausted all available
avenues of administrative relief prior to submitting her
application to the BCMR; and the application will only be
reconsidered upon exhausting all subordinate avenues of
administrative relief.
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-01566 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Apr 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, NGB/A1P, dated 20 Apr 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Aug 14.AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04760
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04760 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the period 22 Jun 10 through 18 Nov 10, be removed from his records and replaced with an existing Letter of Evaluation (LOE) for the same period. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01104
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PP recommends denial indicating the applicant has not exhausted all remedies prior to petitioning the AFBCMR for relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05857
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PP recommends denial because the applicant has not exhausted her administrative remedies. The applicant states that her referral EPR, should not have made it to administrative personnel after the Additional Rater and Reviewer non-concurred with the unjust rating. In...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00598
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The DOD Financial Management Regulation states those in the grades of O-1 to O-3 with more than 1,460 points as a warrant officer and/or enlisted member should receive credit for their service. AFI 36- 2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, states the request will be denied if the applicant has not exhausted all available and effective remedies. A complete copy of the A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00028
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The inclusive dates of 10 Dec 07 through 29 Jun 11 are incorrect as there are officer performance reports (OPR) accomplished for 2010, 2011, and 2012, which are on file in her records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03292
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice which would warrant granting relief. In order to give him additional service time for the excess time he spent in ISLRS, the record would have to be changed to create a break in service after his...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01278
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K concurs with the recommendation from AFRC/RMG to deny the applicants request for pay and points for the period May Jul 13. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Exhibit D. Letter,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00031
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00031 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 8 Jan 10 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In view of this and since this avenue of administrative relief was available at the time the applicant submitted...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00287
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00287 XXXXXXx COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 28 Sept 12, 15 Jan 13, and 19 Apr 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation. In view of this...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03925
The Board should consider her untimely application in the interest of justice because her records were never evaluated for awards during the time of her deployment. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Feb 15, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). The Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed this application and indicated there is an available avenue of administrative relief (Force...